Legal matters with photography in public.

A collection of resources about photographers rights


Bookmark and Share
Legal matters in photography are a sticky issue
Recent projects I am working on made me question the legality of taking photographs in various questionable places, publishing those and the possible consequences of my actions.

It is very sad to begin with that photo enthusiasts, amateurs or professional photographers that simply want to express their point of view of the world in an artistic way have to worry about such banal matters. But, we live in a society and not in an agglomeration of individuals - or so wee'd like to think or make ourselves believe. Hence there are certain and thoughts and aspects that may concern the uninvolved individual in a complete different way than the photographer and vice versa. So consequently some rules and regulations have been put into place and it's worth it to have at least an overview over the basics.

So let us begin thinking about situations where we ask ourselves whether or not it is questionable to shoot:

Shooting private property


Cafe Sorento in Milford, Massachusetts
Often some of us find ourselves cruising along and seeing this old, interesting house along the road, or this really eclectic something in front of that house. But we are reluctant to just stop the car and take an image. Why? There is, officially no reason to do so. You can freely photograph anything that you see as long you are on public property, like the roadside or the walkway. That is the case at least as long as you are not disturbing someone's deserved and expected privacy. So, sticking your lens through the hedges and taking images of the BBQ is a no no as well as zooming into somebody's living room. If the owner is happening sitting on the front stairs, you are free to go. In this case, it really comes down to how you quick - or polite - you are....

Street photography


Have you ever been kneeling on the street, taking your shot down the road and suddenly somebody, out of the blue, starts yelling at you and complaining that he or she is in your photograph? Well, you have all right to take that image, with or without that person. The public place rule comes into place. As a side note: Has anyone of those complainers ever asked themselves how many secretly security cameras caught their likeness? On the street and in public, you are allowed, against common believe, to take images from (and not exclusively) the following objects: celebrities, crime and fire scenes (careful though), children, police officers, airports, train stations, public utilities and really any sort of infrastructure, like bridges and the means. There is one little exception: they probably chase us away once we start taking images of military facilities...

What exactly is a public place?


A proper
public place is any place that can be entered by the public because the public is invited or is made for use by the public. So,of course there are streets and side walks, parks and the means. But also lobbies of office buildings, the subway and even the mall are considered being public places, since the public is invited to enter. The general rule is, that you are allowed to take photographs there. Unless, it is noted otherwise. And when you look around, almost every office building lobby will post a big "no photo" sign.

Photographing in the malls


This is a
heavily discussed subject on the web. A lot of malls surprisingly don't have photography guidelines in place. From what I have seen, there are no rules posted alongside the normal mall rules, neither did I find anything on the malls home pages. If worst comes to worst, the mall security personal can ask you to stop photographing and leave the mall. They can not however take your camera or film or even ask you to delete your images. If you run into this situation, you should insist on having a proper law enforcement officer on the site (which by the way is not allowed to do this either). It is your decision to argue to the bitter end or simply to be polite. Whatever you do, don't give your camera away...

Photographing in the Subway


the Boston T impression, downtown crossing blue columns
I consider this an also heavily discussed subject, Inspired by the photography of Bruce Davidson and a little side project of mine, I researched this matter a bit. And once I started asking google with some broad search terms, I quickly found many discussions about whether or not to allow photography in the NYC subway system due to national security (...). There were actually official bans in the talks. Well, thankfully that ban never came true. Today places like the NYC subway and the Boston T have rules and regulation in place, which essentially grant photographers rights to take images there. We are mainly restricted with the use of tripods, lights and other equipment.
I essentially learned that it is a good thing to know and to be confident about those rules. While shooting on the Boston T, I have been a few times asked by officials what I am doing after spending quite some time at a single location. Explaining them in a brief manner always cleared the situation: I mean no harm, I know my rights, I know yours, so do you, leave me alone. Good. But again, it comes down to being respectful and polite. That will always carry us far.
You can find here
the regulations of the MBTA about photography in the Boston T system. I always have a copy on me when shooting down there, which I did not need so far.


Abandoned buildings - or Trespassing


A lot of us like abandoned buildings and places. Such locations are just popular amongst photographers. Why is that? This old brick building, sitting quietly in the fog of the early morning hours has a eery fascination: it is waiting to be explored. Rooms full of stories to be told and to be listened to.... fascinating. Fact is, that all those buildings or locations are usually owned by somebody and fenced off somehow. Which means, once you enter, you are trespassing. The consequences of being arrested while trespassing? In Massachusetts they are 30 days in jail and/or a $100 fine. Is that reasonable for a good shot? Well, you better answer that question for yourself. As a little side not here: once you start cracking open fences and doors and breaking windows in order to get in, you are not trespassing anymore. You are breaching in. So, essentially, when you are not caught while trespassing the old building is only part of the whole
picturevacant building, scary scene
Once you publish that image with details about the location where it has been taken, it can be used as proof against you that you actually entered that building - this is of course only the case if the right person with the right mindset finds that image, starts the process and uses it against you. Granted, an unlikely scenario, but in the ages of the internet and online publishing this possibility is most certainly not out of reach ("man hat schon Pferde kotzen sehen")


Final thoughts


Photographers tend to venture off the beaten paths. That is a good thing. This enables us to provide society with views and expressions of an ordinary world in a way that is foreign to them. Leaving the beaten paths however can bring us quickly in questionable situations, as discussed above. Knowing our rights and our limits is a quintessence to our work. And, although in the U.S. we live in a society which is driven by laws and regulations (I am still dreaming about the "it's the law" towel for everybody) it comes down to your very own wit and most of all, politeness. Do you really want to promote the image of the guy sitting at the front stairs of his or her house that ended up yelling at you and calling the police, no matter how expressive the image actually is? Do you really want to publish that shot of that street scene where one of the "contenders" ended up swearing at you? Do you really still
feel that image? Be thoughtful about what you are doing, be polite and respectful and listen to your common sense. That's anyhow how I tend to address any sticky situation...
Enjoy shooting out there.

Some resources about photographers rights:


photos and the law
provides you with information about photographers rights and intellectual property.
the legality of urban exploration
explains some issues about privacy and trespassing.
the photographers right
document gives an overview about our rights in some not so uncommon situations.
A
column and its followup about photographers rights in USA today.
A
case study about photographers rights.

Disclaimer
I am not a lawyer. I am no legal advice, nor should or can you refer to this article in case you are in confrontation with the law. In fact, this article is a collection of resources found on the internet and my very own thoughts about those in regards to the matters discussed above. I am not suggesting any illegal activities or promote such behavior.